INEC Nominee Joash Amupitan Clears Air on False Claims of Representing Tinubu in 2023 Election Tribunal Amid Senate Confirmation
In Nigeria’s charged political landscape, where every nomination sparks whispers of bias, a top electoral official’s swift denial has quelled a brewing controversy just as the Senate rubber-stamped his appointment. Professor Joash Amupitan’s emphatic rejection of rumors tying him to President Bola Tinubu’s defense team underscores the razor-thin line between fact and fiction in the lead-up to 2027 elections.
Professor Joash Amupitan (SAN), President Tinubu’s nominee for INEC Chairman, firmly dismissed reports during his Senate screening on October 16, 2025, that he represented Tinubu at the 2023 Presidential Election Petitions Tribunal (PEPC). The Ilorin-based academic and senior advocate, who replaces outgoing Chairman Mahmood Yakubu, presented certified true copies (CTCs) of tribunal and Supreme Court records to prove he never appeared in the case. “I was not part of it. I never appeared in the presidential election tribunal or at the Supreme Court,” Amupitan told the Senate Committee of the Whole, addressing concerns raised by Senate President Godswill Akpabio. The clarification came amid viral social media claims labeling him as Tinubu’s “lead counsel,” which erupted shortly after his October 9 nomination and National Council of State endorsement. This INEC nominee Tinubu representation clarification, Amupitan 2023 election tribunal denial, INEC chairman confirmation 2025, Nigeria electoral neutrality concerns, and Senate screening INEC nominee are dominating headlines, highlighting the scrutiny on impartiality as Nigeria eyes future polls.
The rumors, traced to X posts and fringe reports, alleged Amupitan led Tinubu’s defense against petitions from Atiku Abubakar (PDP) and Peter Obi (Labour Party), who challenged INEC’s declaration of Tinubu as winner with 8.79 million votes. Fact-checks by outlets like Dubawa and TheCable confirmed no evidence: Tribunal records list 12 lawyers, including Lateef Fagbemi (SAN) and Ahmad Usman El-Marzuq (SAN), but omit Amupitan. Babatunde Ogala (SAN), Tinubu’s 2023 coordinator, debunked the claims earlier, challenging skeptics to produce proof via CTCs. Amupitan also denied representing Obi or Atiku, reinforcing his neutrality. The PEPC dismissed the petitions in September 2023, with the Supreme Court upholding Tinubu’s victory in October.
Amupitan’s background as a University of Ilorin law professor and constitutional expert (with over 30 years in academia and advocacy) fueled his nomination, but the whispers threatened to taint it. Nominated on October 9 and endorsed by the Council of State, he faced a two-hour grilling on electoral reforms, including auditing 2023 polls and deploying drones for monitoring. He vowed INEC independence, proposing an investigative arm for credibility and dismissing the IReV portal as non-official per Supreme Court rulings. The Senate confirmed him unanimously post-screening, making him INEC’s sixth substantive chair.
Reactions have been polarized yet affirming. Legal analysts praised the denial’s thoroughness: “Amupitan’s CTC evidence shuts down the noise—neutrality is paramount for INEC,” said constitutional expert Emeka Nwankwo. On X, #INECChairman trended with users like @LegalNaija posting: “Burden of proof met—rumors debunked. Now, focus on 2027 reforms.” (over 2,000 views). Critics, including PDP chieftains, lingered on broader distrust: “Tinubu’s pick? We need full disclosure,” tweeted a PDP youth wing account. Fact-checkers urged vigilance against disinformation, noting similar smears in past nominations.
For U.S. readers, this episode resonates amid global election integrity debates, especially with Nigeria’s diaspora (over 400,000 strong) influencing remittances ($20B+ annually) and U.S.-Africa trade ($10B in 2025). Politically, it mirrors U.S. concerns over impartiality in bodies like the FEC, potentially impacting Biden-era aid tied to democratic reforms. Economically, a credible INEC bolsters investor confidence in Nigeria’s $500B economy, stabilizing markets for U.S. firms in oil and tech. Lifestyle ties? Diaspora watch parties in Atlanta or Houston dissect these dramas, blending cultural pride with calls for transparency—vital as 2027 looms. Tech-wise, it spotlights AI fact-checking tools to combat viral falsehoods, akin to U.S. efforts post-2024 elections.
User intent for searches like “INEC nominee Tinubu representation” typically seeks verification, screening highlights, and reform promises—voters probing bias, analysts eyeing 2027 risks. Coverage prioritizes CTC-backed facts from Senate records, balancing rumors with denials for trust.
As Amupitan assumes the helm, his clarification sets a tone for transparency, but the episode exposes Nigeria’s fragile trust in institutions. With 2027 on the horizon, quelling such whispers isn’t just damage control—it’s electoral armor. This INEC nominee Tinubu representation clarification, Amupitan 2023 election tribunal denial, INEC chairman confirmation 2025, Nigeria electoral neutrality concerns, and Senate screening INEC nominee remind us: In democracy’s arena, truth is the ultimate ballot.
By Sam Michael
Follow and subscribe to us to increase push notifications.
INEC nominee Tinubu representation clarification, Amupitan 2023 election tribunal denial, INEC chairman confirmation 2025, Nigeria electoral neutrality concerns, Senate screening INEC nominee