In a landmark move, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) secured a $1.4 million settlement from LeoPalace Guam Corporation for discriminating against American workers in favor of Japanese nationals. This action underscores the agency’s intensified pro-American enforcement under Chair Andrea Lucas, targeting national origin bias in hiring, pay, and job ads. Employers face stricter scrutiny to ensure merit-based practices, with new guidance warning against preferences for foreign visa holders. Discover key details, implications, and how Title VII protects U.S. workers from unlawful favoritism toward migrant or guest workers. Stay informed on evolving labor laws amid rising complaints.
The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) announced a $1.4 million settlement with LeoPalace Guam Corporation, operator of the LeoPalace Resort, over allegations of national origin discrimination that shortchanged American employees. This resolution, reached in February but gaining renewed attention amid the agency’s pro-American enforcement drive, signals a tougher stance on workplace biases favoring foreign workers. EEOC Chair Andrea Lucas emphasized the move as part of broader efforts to safeguard U.S. workers under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.
The LeoPalace Discrimination Allegations Unfold
LeoPalace Guam, a major hotel on the U.S. territory, faced EEOC scrutiny starting in 2015 for systematically underpaying and undervaluing non-Japanese staff. Court filings revealed American-origin employees received inferior wages, benefits, and work conditions compared to Japanese counterparts in similar roles. The lawsuit, filed in federal court, argued this violated Title VII by creating a two-tier system based on national origin.
EEOC investigators uncovered patterns where Japanese nationals enjoyed perks like higher salaries and better assignments, while Americans were sidelined. “This wasn’t isolated— it reflected deeper biases that disadvantaged loyal U.S. workers,” said an EEOC spokesperson in the press release.
Settlement Terms: Monetary Relief and Oversight
Under the consent decree, LeoPalace will distribute $1,412,500 to affected employees, including back pay and damages. Beyond cash, the company must implement sweeping reforms:
- Hire an independent equal employment opportunity monitor for three years to audit hiring, pay equity, and policies.
- Provide mandatory anti-discrimination training to all staff.
- Reinstate eligible former American employees who wish to return.
- Submit quarterly reports to the EEOC on compliance metrics.
The monitor will conduct random audits, ensuring no recurrence of origin-based favoritism. LeoPalace denied liability but opted for settlement to resolve the matter swiftly.
EEOC’s Renewed Pro-American Enforcement Agenda
This settlement arrives as the EEOC ramps up its pro-American enforcement under Lucas, appointed acting chair in January 2025. On November 19, she unveiled updated resources, including a fact sheet titled “Discrimination Against American Workers Is Against The Law.” Lucas called anti-American bias a “large-scale problem” across industries, vowing aggressive investigations.
The guidance ties into the Trump administration’s immigration priorities, aiming to deter exploitation of visa programs like H-1B or H-2A that sideline U.S. talent. Since January, the EEOC has prioritized national origin cases, filing more subpoenas and conciliations.
Common Violations Highlighted in New EEOC Materials
The EEOC’s updates outline red flags for employers, drawing from cases like LeoPalace. Here’s a breakdown of prohibited practices:
- Discriminatory Job Ads: Listings specifying “H-1B preferred” or “visa holders only” deter Americans and breach Title VII.
- Unequal Application Processes: Making it harder for U.S. citizens to apply, such as requiring extra documentation not demanded of foreign applicants.
- Pay and Perk Disparities: Lower wages for Americans justified by “cost savings” or perceived “better work ethic” in migrants—none of which hold up legally.
- Client Preferences as Excuses: Claiming customers favor foreign workers doesn’t justify discrimination.
These bullet points stem from the EEOC’s technical assistance, which urges workers to file charges within 180-300 days of incidents.
Broader Implications for Businesses Nationwide
Employers in hospitality, tech, and agriculture—sectors hit hard by visa reliance—should audit practices now. The EEOC warns that even “business justifications” like lower labor costs won’t shield against liability. Legal experts predict a spike in class actions, with potential multimillion-dollar penalties.
One labor attorney noted, “This pro-American enforcement isn’t rhetoric; it’s reshaping hiring norms to prioritize merit over origin.” Companies like LeoPalace serve as cautionary tales, pushing for diverse, equitable systems.
In summary, the LeoPalace settlement reinforces the EEOC’s commitment to eradicating national origin discrimination, protecting American workers from unfair foreign preferences. As enforcement intensifies, businesses must adapt to foster inclusive environments or risk costly repercussions. This pivotal step under Lucas’s leadership promises fairer opportunities for U.S. talent across the board.
For more on corporate counsel insights, visit Law.com. Follow the discussion on X at EEOC’s official account.